Is Paul the Muslim Mahdi? Themes of Religion and Power in Dune

Dune by Frank Herbert is widely regarded as the best science fiction novel ever written. The recent film adaption of the first half of the novel, directed by Denis Villeneuve, won six Academy Awards. This post will look at the religious themes and influences in Dune and what many people get wrong about the story.

Dune is set 24368 years in the future (Willis E. McNally, The Dune Encyclopedia, Berkley Books, New York, 1984, pp.7-8). The human race has spread out across the universe, which is ruled by the Padishah Emperor Shaddam IV. Below the Emperor is the Landsraad, the nobility or Great Houses which included House Atreides and their rivals House Harkonnen. The Emperor has assigned Duke Leto Atreides to replace the Harkonnens as the managers of the planet Arrakis or Dune which is the only source for Melange or Spice, a substance which prolongs life, expands consciousness, and enables navigation through hyperspace. This makes Arrakis the most important planet in the universe. Leto relocates to Arrakis, accompanied by his concubine Lady Jessica and their son Paul who has been having dreams about the future. Jessica is a Bene Gesserit, a female order which is seeking to breed a superhuman, the Kwisatz Haderach, which means “shortening of the way” or “the one who can be in many places at once”. The plan had been for Jessica to have a daughter who marry a Harkonnen and produce the Kwisatz Haderach, but she chose to have a son instead.

Frank Herbert has said the inspiration for the Bene Gesserit was his Catholic aunts who tried to convert him to Catholicism. “Gesserit” is derived from Jesuit (Brian Herbert, Dreamer of Dune, 2003, ebook edition, pp. 165, 169). Perhaps, Paul’s resentment at the Bene Gesserit’s attempts to manipulate him is also based on Herbert’s Catholic aunts.

The inhabitants of Arrakis are the Fremen, desert tribes, which were originally known as the Zensunni Wanderers. Their religion is based on Zen Buddhism and Islam (Dreamer of Dune, p. 172, The Dune Encyclopedia, pp. 697-698). Their language is derived from Arabic (The Dune Encyclopedia, pp. 323-324). A glossary of the Arabic terms in Dune can be found at Arabic and Islamic themes in Frank Herbert’s Dune. “Kwisatz haderach” is not Arabic, but appears to be derived from the Hebrew “kefitzat haderech” which refers to Jewish legends about people who appeared to teleport, travel at impossible speed, or be in two places at once (Bob Rickard, “The Shortening of the Way”, Fortean Times, November 2021, pp. 34-41). The Fremen are waiting for the coming of the Mahdi, who will deliver them from their oppressors. In Islam, the Mahdi is their equivalent of the Messiah. This belief was planted in the Fremen culture by Bene Gesserit missionaries centuries earlier. When the Atreides arrive on Arrakis, Paul is hailed by the Fremen as the Mahdi (Frank Herbert, Dune, Gollanz, London, 2007, pp. 107-118).

However, in the words of a certain Dune rip-off, “It’s a trap!” The Emperor has planned to betray the Atreides. He sends his troops to help the Harkonnens to attack Arrakis. Leto is killed. Jessica and Paul escape into the desert. They join the Fremen. Paul gets a Fremen girlfriend Chani. He rides one of Arrakis’ giant sandworms and takes the Fremen name, Muad’Dib, which is the name of a desert mouse and one of Arrakis’ moons. It also sounds like “Mahdi”. He takes the Water of Life, concentrated Melange, and believes he is the Kwisatz Haderach. Paul Muad’Dib unites the Fremen tribes and leads them in a jihad to defeat the Emperor and the Harknonnens. Paul now controls the Spice. He marries the Emperor’s daughter, Princess Irulan, and becomes the new ruler of the universe.

I saw the 1984 David Lynch movie before I read the book, so it coloured my perception of the novel. At the end, the hero Paul is triumphant, he has defeated his enemies, the good guys have won, it starts raining, and they all lived happily ever after. As I will explain, Frank Herbert’s intended themes and message have been lost.

Reading the sequels, Dune Messiah and Children of Dune, after the David Lynch movie felt like something of a letdown, a case of the sequels being inferior to the original. In Dune Messiah Paul is the ruler of the universe. A new religion has grown up around him. The Fremen have gone on a jihad and killed billions. Paul thinks he is the greatest mass murderer in history. The Fremen are free of the Harkonnens but their traditional way of life has been destroyed. Fremen society and religion have become commercialized and corrupted. Paul is blinded in an attack. he abdicated and wanders off into the desert. Chani dies in childbirth, giving birth to twins.

In Children of Dune Paul has become a wandering prophet condemning the religious and political system built in his name. One of science fiction’s greatest characters ends up being killed somewhat ignominiously by one of his own priests in a riot. His son Leto II merges with the sandworms and becomes the God Emperor who rules for 3500 years.

The influence on the Star Wars prequels is obvious. Like Paul, Anakin Skywalker is believed to be the chosen one. Instead, he establishes the evil empire. His wife dies in childbirth giving birth to twins, a boy and a girl. His son grows up to be the real chosen one.

Dune‘s motifs of hordes of black-clad Fremen, being led by the prophesied Mahdi, coming out of the desert, to wage jihad and destruction on their oppressors who wanted the resource which their civilization depends on, is clearly reminiscent of the Middle East and its oil reserves, with Muslim fundamentalists resentful of Western interference and expecting the coming of the Mahdi. The two movies of Dune (1984 and 2021) and the 2000 miniseries have toned down the Islamic reference and substituted “crusade” for “jihad”.

Another Middle Eastern influence on Dune was the First World War’s Lawrence of Arabia, Colonel Thomas Edward Lawrence, an outsider with something of a Messiah complex who came in and united the desert tribes and led them in the fight against the Ottoman Empire which had subjugated them.

However, Dune should not be interpreted as Islamic fundamentalist propaganda with Paul as the Mahdi hero. The point, which Frank Herbert was trying to make, was that heroes are not necessarily a good thing. He has said,

“I conceived of a long novel, the whole trilogy as one book about the messianic convulsions that periodically overtake us. Demagogues, fanatics, con-game artists, the innocent and not-so-innocent bystanders – all were to play a part in the drama. This grows from my theory that superheroes are disastrous for humankind, that even if we find a real hero (whatever that may be), eventually fallible mortals take over the power structure that always comes into being around such a leader. What better way to destroy a civilization, a society or a race than to set people into the wild oscillations which follow their turning over their judgement and decision-making faculties to a superhero?” (Tim O’Reilly, The Maker of Dune, Berkley Books, New York, 1987, p. 97)

“It is demonstrable that power structures tend to attract people who want power for the sake of power and that a significant proportion of such people are sufficiently imbalanced they could be called insane. That was the beginning: heroes are painful, superheroes involve too many of us in disaster” (The Maker of Dune, p. 98)

Paul’s story arc is an example of the theory of the Hero’s Journey. Brian Herbert writes,

“Paul is the hero prince on a quest, as described by Carl Gustave Jung, Joseph Campbell, and Lord Raglan. One of the books my father studied, Raglan’s The Hero (published in 1936) outlined twenty-two steps followed by classic heroes. These included (all of which closely approximate the life of Paul Muad’Dib): (a) the hero’s father is a king (a duke in Paul’s case); (b) the circumstances of his conception are unusual; (c) he is reputed to be the son of a god (Paul is reputed to be a returning god, a messiah); (d) an attempt is made to kill him at birth (in Paul’s case, the attempt occurred in his youth); (e) after a victory over the king and/or a giant, dragon, or wild beast, he (f) marries a princess (Irulan, his wife in name only, is the daughter of Emperor Shaddam Corrino. The mother of his Paul’s children, Chani, is the daughter of a kinglike figure to the Fremen, Liet-Kynes) and (g) becomes a king.” (Dreamer of Dune, pp. 160-161)

Paul’s fall from power in the sequels can also be understood as part of the Hero’s Journey.

The theory of the Hero’s Journey is largely derived from the Greek myth of Oedipus, King of Thebes. When Oedipus was born, it was prophesied that he would kill his father and marry his mother. His father, hoping to avert the prophecy, gave his baby son to a shepherd and inadvertently set in motion the events which would lead to the prophecy’s fulfillment. Oedipus grew up and not knowing his identity, killed his father, became king, and married his mother. When the truth was revealed, Oedipus blinded himself, abdicated, and became a wandering exile, which is reminiscent of the blind Paul going into the desert at the end of Dune Messiah.

LIke Odepius, Paul is ultimately a tragic figure. He has power, but he is trapped. He knows from his prescience that if he avenges his House and defeats his enemies, he will set in motion events that will lead to the deaths of billions and he will be seen as an evil tyrant, but he still has to do it.

The myth of Oedipus was also the basis for the somewhat dubious theory of the Oedipus Complex developed by Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) who proposed that boys want to kill their father and marry their mother. There are hints of the Oedipus Complex in Dune. It is only after Paul’s father is killed that he comes into his own and his rise to power begins, and well, Paul’s relationship with his mother Jessica strikes me as a little odd.

In the novels, Princess Irulan becomes Paul’s official biographer, writing about how great he was. I have come to the conclusion that the 1984 movie is basically an adaption of Irulan’s biography, rather than Frank Herbert’s novel. Herbert’s themes about the dangers of heroes and power have been lost and replaced with official propaganda about the glory of Muad’Dib.

A lot of people focus on the first book and think Frank Herbert should have stopped there because the sequels do not measure up to the original. I have felt this way. However, this is like stopping at Fellowship of the Ring. Dune Messiah and Children of Dune are not ill-conceived afterthoughts. The story of Dune was always meant to be a trilogy (The Maker of Dune, pp. 95, 97). Herbert wrote parts of Dune Messiah and Children of Dune before he had finished Dune (The Maker of Dune, p. 105). To focus on Paul’s victory in Dune but ignore the consequences of his victory and his decline and fall in the sequels misses the point Herbert wanted to make about the dangers of heroes.

So, is Paul the Muslim Mahdi? Sort of, but Dune is neither anti- nor pro-Islam. Rather, Herbert used the concept of the Mahdi, a hero/messiah figure to portray the dangers of power, religion, and heroes. He could have just as easily made the same point in a novel about exiled Catholics in the distant future waiting for the return of the Pope to restore them.

Australia’s Forgotten First Revival in Launceston in 1832

In a 2016 post I wrote that the first revival in Australia occurred in Wesley Hall in Melville Street, Hobart, in 1834. I have now learned that an earlier revival began in Launceston in 1832. Little information about this revival has survived, but like many Australian revivals, it was led by the Methodists.

The first Methodist attempt to establish a presence in Launceston was unsuccessful. In 1826 a Methodist chapel was built in Cameron Street, but they could not find a minister and it closed in 1828. The building was sold to the government. The money was used to build a Presbyterian church.

In their history of evangelicals in Australia, Stuart Piggin and Robert Linder referred to a revival in early Launceston, “There were Wesleyans aplenty, including Francis French, a farmer from Cornwall, who in 1832 preached up revival under the trees at Windmill Hill, East Launceston.” (Stuart Piggin and Robert Linder, The Fountain of Public Prosperity, Evangelical Christians in Australian History 1740-1914, Monash University Press, Melbourne, 2018, p. 219)

French appeared to be following in the footsteps of Methodism’s founder John Wesley by preaching in the open, not in a church building. His ministry has been described as a revival which in 1832 predates any other recorded revival in Australia (see Stuart Piggin, The History of Revival in Australia in Mark Hutchinson and Edmund (editors), Re-Visioning Australian Colonial Christianity, New Essays in the Australian Christian Experience 1788-1900, Centre for the Study of Australian Christianity, Sydney, 1994). It was apparently Australia’s first revival. French appears to have laid the foundation for the future Methodist mission in Launceston. Unfortunately, we know next to nothing about his ministry.

Books on the history of Methodism in Tasmania devote about a sentence to Francis French’s preaching (C.C. Dugan, A Century of Tasmanian Methodism 1820-1920, Tasmanian Methodist Assembly, Hobart, 1920, p. 57, C.C. Dugan, The Story of the Paterson Methodist Church, Trustees of the Church, Launceston, 1932, p. 5, K.J. Heazlewood, Early Methodism in Northern Tasmania, 1970(?), p.1, R.D. Pretyman, A Chronicle of Methodism in Van Diemen’s Land, Aldersgate Press, Melbourne, 1970, p. 88, M.E.J. Stansall, Tasmanian Methodism 1820-1975, Methodist Church of Australiasia, Launceston, 1975, p. 39)

The history of the French and Badcock families, Go…Be Fruitful and Multiply, says that Francis French was born in Cornwall in 1791. Francis and his wife Mary arrived in Hobart Town in 1831 and moved to Launceston. They lived in York Street (Go… Be Fruitful and Multiply, A History of the Francis French, John Badcock and Edward French Families and Their Descendants from the Late Eighteenth Century to 1989, French and Badcock Family Book Committee, 1989, p 25). It says he preached at the “foot of Windmill Hill” and “It is said that his listeners used wooden blocks for seats. A grandson of Francis French, Roland French, said that when he was preaching at the Baptist Church at Deloraine, an old man came to him and told him how as a young man he had helped set up those wooden blocks for Francis French.” (p. 26)

French moved to Longford and became a farmer. In 1834 John Allen Manton (1807-1864), who had previously served as a Methodist chaplain in Macquarie Harbour and Port Arthur, arrived in Launceston.

Engraving of John Allen Manton, c. 1855, by an unknown artist in the National Portrait Gallery

In letters, which were printed in the Wesleyan Methodist Magazine, Manton described a revival among the Methodists in Launceston. It is not clear whether this was a continuation of the revival which began under Francis French or a second revival. In a letter, dated June 3, 1835, John Manton wrote,

“It is with heartfelt praise that I report the state of religion on this town. I am truly thankful to my gracious God for what my eyes see, from day to day. A spirit of hearing the word of God prevails among the people to a degree never known before. They flock to the house of prayer, but many seek admittance n vain. Our temporary chapel is so small that, when the people are crowded in, it will not contain more than three hundred persons: many stand outside, and many go away not able to get in, and not willing or not able to stand without. We, however, look forward with pleasure to the day when our commodious chapel, which is now erecting, shall be opened to the glory of God; and we fully anticipate its being filled with attentive hearers.” (Wesleyan Methodist Magazine, Ser. 3, Vol. 15, No. 247, p. 227)

The population of Launceston was between 3000 and 4000 at this time, which means about 10% of the population attended or tried to attend these meetings.

The evidence is meager, but the “temporary chapel”, in which Manton says the revival occurred, seems to have been the original Methodist chapel which had been sold in 1828. K.J. Heazlewood writes, “Until the church[in Paterson Street] was built, the Methodists had use of the building they had sold to the government some years earlier” (Early Methodism in Northern Tasmania, p. 2) (see also A Chronicle of Methodism in Van Diemen’s Land, p 88) While the first Methodist attempts in Launceston had appeared to end in failure, it became the location for a revival (Isaiah 55:11).

In December 1835, the new Methodist chapel in Paterson Street was opened. The revival continued there. In a letter, dated February 25, 1836, Manton wrote,

“It will not fail to give you pleasure to hear the Lord is graciously prospering his work in this station. Many who a short time ago were enemies to God by wicked works are now the willing, devoted and faithful sons and daughters of the Most High, being turned from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God. Truly are their “blasphemies turned to praise”…. On the last Saturday evening, in particular, we experienced such a baptism of the Holy Spirit as we never had before. We were so overwhelmed with the divine presence, that our prayers were turned to praise; towards the conclusion of the evening we could do nothing but praise the Lord. I have reason to believe that the greater part of the society is feeling the influence of this revival: and we steadfastly resolve not to rest until sinners are brought to God, and our borders have become greatly enlarged.” (Wesleyan Methodist Magazine, Ser. 3, Vol. 15, No. 905, p. 869)

Pilgrim Hall, former Methodist Chapel, in Paterson Street, 2021

Manton left Launceston around 1827. In 1855 he became headmaster of Horton College, a Methodist boys school near Ross, Tasmania, and in 1863 he became president of Newington College in New South Wales. He died in 1864.

In 1841-42 the first Holy Trinity Church (Anglican) was built next to the old Methodist chapel. The photo below from Cemeteries & Churches & Things was taken from Windmill Hill in the 1860s. It shows the old Holy Trinity Church on the corner of George and Cameron Streets, next to the former Methodist chapel on Cameron Street. In History of Holy Trinity Chruch, J. G. Branagan describes it as “a somewhat decrepit old building.” (J.G. Brangan, History of Holy Trinity Chruch, Regal Publications, Launceston, n.d., p. 2)

(Cropped from QVMAG, QMV: 1983:P:1198)

In the late 1890s both buildings were demolished and the new Holy Trinity Church was built on the location of the old Methodist chapel.

Holy Trinity Anglican Church in Cameron Street, built on the site of the original Methodist chapel

Francis French died in 1850 and was buried in the Longford Christ Church cemetery. In 1831 his daughter married John Badcock. Some of their descendants still live in the northern Midlands of Tasmania.

The grave of Francis French in the Longford Christ Church (Anglican) cemetery, Longford. Photo from Billion Graves

Stuart Piggin and Robert Linder have described nineteenth-century Launceston as a “Bible belt” (The Fountain of Public Prosperity, p. 218) and an “evangelical stronghold”(p. 219). The large number of churches (and buildings which used to be churches) in inner Launceston show there was once a much stronger evangelical presence than today. It was not just the Methodists, other denominations, such as the Baptists and Congregationalists, also contributed to Launceston’s evangelical heritage, but Francis French’s founding contribution has been largely forgotten.

The Evangelical Majority in the First ALP Federal Caucus

The first Federal Caucus of the Australian Labor Party was elected in 1901. It consisted of 16 Members of the House of Representatives and 8 Members of the Senate. It might be surprising today to learn that most of them were Evangelical Christians. In the chapter “The First Caucus” in True Believers, The Story of the Federal Parliamentary Labor Party, Stuart Macintyre writes that “there were six Presbyterians, five Anglicans, three Methodists, two Congregationalists, a number of members of Nonconformist sects, and only three Catholics. Some were merely nominal adherents, but around half of the Caucus worshipped on Sunday.”( John Faulkner and Stuart Macintyre (editors), True Believers, The Story of the Federal Parliamentary Labor Party, Allen and Unwin, NSW, 2001, p. 24)

Macintyre does not say how many Nonconformists there were, but they appear to have been Egerton Lee Batchelor from South Australia, a member of the Church of Christ, and King O’Malley from Tasmania who is a bit hard to categorize, but when he was previously living in the United States, he was First Bishop of the Waterlily Rock Bound Church which he founded.

This means that 18 of the 24 (three-quarters) Caucus members were Evangelicals or Protestants, and one quarter were Presbyterians, including James Black Ronald, a Presbyterian minister, which sounds odd today because I do not know many Presbyterians (i.e. none) who vote Labor.

James Black Ronald, ALP member for Southern Melbourne and Presbyterian minister

Although the religion we would usually associate with the ALP would be Catholicism, there were only three Catholics. The first Caucus was surprisingly Protestant and Evangelical.

First Australian Labor Party 1901

I first became aware of the Evangelical representation in the first ALP Caucus in The Fountain of Public Prosperity by Stuart Piggin and Robert Linder who described the period from 1870 10 1914 as “the high-noon of Australian Protestantism. Six out of ten adults in Melbourne and four out of ten in Sydney were in Church every Sunday.” (Stuart Piggin and Robert Linder, The Fountain of Public Prosperity, Evangelical Christians in Australian History 1740-1914, Monash University Press, Victoia, 2018, p. 386) Their book shows that Evangelicals were once a lot more prominent and influential in Australia than historians usually acknowledge.

Many Evangelicals were concerned with poverty and social reforms and found common ground with the emerging Australian Labor Party. Earlier, 60% of the first Parliamentary ALP, which was elected in New South Wales in 1891, were Evangelicals. 9 were Methodists and 12 were from other Evangelical denominations (Robert Linder, “The Methodist Love Affair with the Australian Labor Party”, 1891-1929″, Lusar 23&24 (1997-1998), pp. 35-61)

Piggin and Linder attributed the decline of Evangelical influence in the ALP in part to class conflict (The Fountain of Public Prosperity, pp. 468-469). The 20th century saw the rise of the suburbs and the middle class and Evangelicals tended to become middle class and identified with the conservative side of politics.

Even if many Evangelicals still agreed with the ALP on some issues of justice and welfare, they would have felt they could no longer support the ALP because of their more progressive policies which Evangelicals regard as in conflict with their Christian values. A few years ago the ALP in my state of Tasmania had a no pokie machines policy. Every Chrisitan I know agreed with them, but they did not vote for them because of their radical social agenda.

The 20th century also saw the rise of anti-Christian Communism and many on the Left, even if they were not Communist, still became increasingly hostile to Evangelicals.

I also suspect that part of this hostility is that the Left does not like the competition. The Old Testament prophets spoke of the coming Kingdom of God in which there would be peace and justice and no poverty. This is pretty much the Socialist vision of the Left, except they think they can do it on their own without the intervention of God. the attempts of Stalin, Mao, and others in the 20th century to create a socialist utopia has shown that attempting to build the Kingdom of God without God can only end in disaster.